Abstract: Representative laboratory studies of contaminant cycling depend on mimicking naturally relevant conditions in an unnatural setting. Some toxicants, like methylmercury (MeHg), are highly complex in their freshwater trophic transfer, with field studies documenting wide variability in biomagnification rates. Experimental work is essential to understand this variability, yet the efficacy of laboratory methods to characterize MeHg transfer in aquatic food webs remains questionable. Our work unpacks how different methodologies affect trophic transfer of MeHg from oligochaete prey (Lumbriculus variegatus) to larval dragonfly predators (Anisoptera sp) using three different methodologies. We quantified dragonfly dietary bioaccumulation from prey dosed aqueously with MeHg-chloride vs MeHg-cysteine, and with prey dosed dietarily with MeHg-contaminated algae. All experiments used 4 MeHg concentrations and ran for 5-8 weeks. We also evaluated impacts of exposure on dragonfly growth, body condition, feeding rate, predator avoidance behavior, and immune response. Preliminary data suggest that dragonflies bioaccumulate MeHg in a dose dependent manner but there is no difference between MeHg-chloride and MeHg-cysteine trophic transfer (p >0.5, Welch’s t-test). All dosed treatments showed biomagnification factors less than 3, decreasing with increasing mercury dose. Prey dosed dietarily with MeHg contaminated algae further refined our study by exploring how increasing exposure realism impacts biomagnification. Whether these data indicate constraints in laboratory methods testing or a realistic view of biomagnification patterns occurring in nature will be explored. We will also present preliminary results of a metanalysis quantifying effect size and variability drivers in predatory invertebrate MeHg biomagnification reported in the literature. Environmentally representative laboratory methods are critical to accurately quantify contaminant risk and characterize toxicity, and successful future monitoring and modeling efforts depend on deeper examination of dietary accumulation by predatory invertebrates.
